SIMS2015 Session FN-TuP: Fundamentals Poster Session
Time Period TuP Sessions | Topic FN Sessions | Time Periods | Topics | SIMS2015 Schedule
FN-TuP-1 Results of Inter-laboratory Tests among Surface Analysis Society of Japan:Mass calibration of positive ion.
Hiroto Itoh (Konica Minolta,inc., Japan); Daisuke Kobayashi (Asahi Glass Co., Ltd., Japan); Shinya Ootomo (Furukawa Electric CO., LTD., Japan); Satoka Aoyagi (Seikei University, Japan) Since time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) is one of the most powerful surface analysis techniques and has been widely used in various fields, the TOF-SIMS working group (WG) was established in Surface Analysis Society of Japan (SASJ), which has contributed in standardization in Japan, on June 2007. One of the most important topics for the SASJ TOF-SIMS WG is identification of surface chemical species, and therefore accurate mass calibration is required. The SASJ TOF-SIMS WG has been working on the investigation of mass calibration and identification and organized TOF-SIMS inter-laboratory studies regarding the mass scale calibration of TOF-SIMS. On the other hand, some pioneering works on the TOF-SIMS inter-laboratory studies such as intensity repeatability, mass scale accuracy and relative quantification have been reported by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) [1-5]. The SASJ TOF-SIMS WG considered those reports and ISO 13084 and also carried out inter-laboratory tests to find out a degree of variation of the mass accuracy, and worked a research of the variation due to conditions for mass calibration based on the results of the measurement. As a result, variation of relative mass accuracy was reduced from about 200 ppm to about 50 ppm [6] by sharing the knowledge obtained from five tests among the SASJ members. Especially, in the fourth inter-laboratory test, the variation of relative mass accuracy was studied using peak positions at a relatively high-mass region, which were not used in the previous tests and which are also described in ISO s tandard [7]. Moreover, a practical method for improving mass accuracy was also investigated. Then, we are referring to the idea of the ISO standard, and tried a new method of using the molecular ion peak for the mass calibration by adding a quaternary ammonium salt to the sample,. In this paper we report on the course of these studies that have been done by SASJ TOF-SIMS WG [8,9]. |
FN-TuP-2 Computer Modeling of keV Bombardment of Polylactic Acid by C60 and Ar872
Michal Kanski (Jagiellonian University, Poland); Dawid Maciazek (Jagiellonian University); Barbara J. Garrison (The Pennsylvania State University); Zbigniew Postawa (Jagiellonian University, Poland) Molecular dynamics computer simulations are used to perform first atomistic simulations of cluster bombardment of a polymer material composed from C, H and O atoms. The ReaxFF potential for C, H and O has been implemented in a parallel MD code [1, 2]. Material ejection, energy transfer pathways and chemical reactions stimulated by keV C60 and Ar872 projectiles bombarding polylactic acid (PLA) at various kinetic energies and impact angles have been investigated. The details of the computational model and a summary of results will be discussed. [1] L. Liu, Y. Liu, S. V. Zybin, H. Sun and W. A. Goddard, Journal of Physical Chemistry A115 (2011) 11016. [2] H. M. Aktulga, J. C. Fogarty, S. A. Pandit, A. Y. Grama, Parallel Computing 38 (2012) 245. |
FN-TuP-3 Computer Modeling of Angular Emission from Mo and Ag Surfaces due to Arn Cluster Bombardment
Dawid Maciazek (Jagiellonian University); Michal Kanski (Jagiellonian University, Poland); Lukasz Gaza (Jagiellonian University); Barbara J. Garrison (The Pennsylvania State University); Zbigniew Postawa (Jagiellonian University, Poland) A wide angular spread of sputtered atoms may have a negative impact on the mass resolution in Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. It has been observed that impacts of large Ar cluster projectiles on flat metal surfaces along the surface normal lead to a strong off-normal material ejection [1]. This effect is known as lateral sputtering. It is attributed predominantly to blocking of substrate particles ejection along the surface normal by a cloud of Ar atoms hovering for a prolonged time above the point of projectile impact. Chernysh et al. have recently studied angular distributions of atoms ejected by 10 keV Ar1000 at normal incidence from surfaces of several metal polycrystals [2]. For Mo surface they observed that most atoms are emitted in directions close to the surface normal. This unusual behavior was hypothesized to be due to a spring like ejection caused by the large elastic constant of molybdenum. Molecular dynamics computer simulations are employed to test this proposition and to investigate the effect of various projectile/sample properties on the angular emission. Argon projectiles with a kinetic energy of 10 keV and 20 keV at normal incidence are used to sputter surfaces of Mo and Ag samples, which have high and low elastic constants respectively. Argon clusters of various sizes (n=60, 250,500, 1000) are used to probe the influence of the projectile size. Finally, both flat and corrugated samples are bombarded to investigate the effect of the sample topography. Our studies could not confirm the proposition of Chernysh et al. Even for 1000 impacts of 20 keV Ar1000 projectiles no ejection from flat Mo surface was recorded. This observation is attributed to a very large binding energy of Mo. Ejection is observed from Ag bombarded by Ar1000 but it is off-normal. Molybdenum begins to sputter when smaller 20 keV Arn projectiles are used. The angular distributions are found to be sensitive to the projectile size and the surface roughness. The shape of the angular spectra shifts towards the surface normal with a decrease of the projectile size. A similar trend is observed with increasing surface roughness. Reduction of the hovering cloud density of projectile atoms and material ejection taking place from randomly inclined surface areas are found to be responsible for such behavior. These effects occur, however, even on the Ag surface which has a low elastic constant. [1] N. Toyoda, H. Kitani, N. Hagiwara, T. Aoki, J. Matsuo, I. Yamada, Mater. Chem. Phys. 54 (1998) 262. [2] V.S. Chernysh, A.E. Ieshkin Yu.A. Ermakov, Appl. Surf. Sci. 326 (2015) 285. |
FN-TuP-4 Peptide Yields for Various Primary Ions in SIMS and ME-SIMS
Martin Körsgen, Andreas Pelster, Ricarda Nees, Klaus Dreisewerd, Dieter Lipinsky, Heinrich F. Arlinghaus (University of Münster, Germany) ToF-SIMS is a powerful technique for imaging molecules with sub-µm lateral resolution. However, detection efficiency and sensitivity often are not high enough to obtain high-resolution images from large molecules. This disadvantage originates mainly from high fragmentation rates caused by high-energy primary ion bombardment as well as generally low ionization probabilities. Detection efficiency for larger molecules can be increased and fragmentation rates reduced by using Aun+, Bin+, C60+, or even large Arn+ clusters as primary cluster ions for increasing near-surface energy deposition. Another promising way would be to modify the surface with organic matrices using matrix-enhanced SIMS (ME-SIMS). In this approach, analyte molecules are embedded in low-weight organic matrices such as common MALDI matrices. We have combined these two approaches to investigate the molecular yield of two peptides (bradykinin and melittin) as a function of primary ion species and cluster sizes as well as of preparation methods. Several different bismuth primary ions and large argon clusters in the mass range between 1000 and 2500 atoms per cluster were used to determine molecular yields and fragment rates. For the experiments, pure peptide solutions were spin-coated, and matrix-peptide mixtures were spray-coated onto silicon wafers. ME-SIMS samples were prepared using two classical MALDI matrices, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) and α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA). With the data obtained, we were able to describe the molecular yield and the fragmentation rate of the analyzed peptides for various primary ion parameters. For bismuth primary cluster ions, the molecular yield was nearly constant in the ME-SIMS samples, while for the neat sample, an increase of the molecular yield with PI cluster size was observed. In contrast, with PI argon clusters the molecular yield decreases with the cluster size for neat samples, while it increases for ME-SIMS samples. |
FN-TuP-5 Practical Examples of Mass Scale Calibration with Molecular Ions of Internal Additives in TOF-SIMS
Daisuke Kobayashi (Asahi Glass Co., Ltd., Japan); Shinya Otomo (Furukawa Electric CO., LTD., Japan); Satoka Aoyagi (Seikei University, Japan); Hiroto Itoh (Konica Minolta,inc., Japan) In terms of surface contamination analysis, an accurate mass scale for time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) is needed to identify unknown high-mass peaks properly, although TOF-SIMS is powerful [1] for chemical analysis and usually has high mass resolution [2, 3]. Regarding mass scale calibration procedures, ISO 13084 formulated in 2011 is helpful. Typical TOF-SIMS spectra, however, do not contain secondary ions that meet ISO recommendations. For example, in order to identify mass m of an unknown high-mass peak, one of secondary ions for mass scale calibration should have mass mA ≥ 0.55m. In this study, we developed a novel method for mass scale calibration in TOF-SIMS spectra using molecular ions of internal additives [4, 5]. Four kinds of target samples, solutions of didecyldimethylammonium bromide (Dc10dma), dioctadecyldimethylammonium chloride (Dc18dma), tetradecyltrimethylammonium chloride (C14TMA) and Tinuvin 770, individually, that easily generate high-mass molecular ion peaks were prepared. Then, solutions of octadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (C18TMA) and sodium hexadecyl sulfate (C16OSO3), individually, were prepared as the internal additives for positive or negative TOF-SIMS spectra. A target sample and an internal additive were selected one by one and were sequentially put on Si wafer by a dropper. TOF-SIMS measurements were carried out on TOF-SIMS 5 (ION-TOF, GmbH) with Bi3++ primary ion. For instance, when C14TMA was employed as the target sample, it was added onto a Si wafer first and then C18TMA used as the internal additive was added to the sample. In this case, the molecular ion peak derived from C14TMA was not detected after the addition of C18TMA though it was highly detected in the positive TOF-SIMS spectrum before the addition. Since water solubility of C14TMA is higher than that of C18TMA, it is assumed that C14TMA is removed from the substrate when C18TMA was added. It should be confirmed that the target peak does not disappear from TOF-SIMS spectrum after addition of the internal additives. Finally, it is indicated that the internal additives are helpful for meeting ISO 13084 when an appropriate combination of internal additives for the target molecule is chosen. [1] A. Hattori, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, (218), 1997, 196. [2] I. S. Gilmore, F. M. Green and M. P. Seah, Surf. Interface Anal., (39), 2007, 817. [3] Y. Abe, H. Itoh, S. Otomo and TOF-SIMS Working Group, J. Surf. Anal., (17), 2010, 186. [4] D. Kobayashi, S. Otomo and H. Ito, J. Surf. Anal., (20), 2014, 187. [5] D. Kobayashi, S. Otomo, S. Aoyagi and H. Ito, Surf. Interface Anal., (46), 2014, 229. |
FN-TuP-6 Design and Implementation of a Custom Built Variable Temperature Stage for a Cameca 7F-GEO
Andrew Giordani, Jay Tuggle (Virginia Tech); Jerry Hunter (University of Wisconsin-Madison) We have designed and implemented a variable temperature stage for a Cameca 7F-GEO SIMS with temperatures ranging from near liquid nitrogen temperatures to 300C with the primary use being to study the temperature dependent relocation of the Cs+ primary ion beam during SIMS analysis[1]. The variable temperature stage extends the usefulness of SIMS by operating across a wide temperature range. This capability makes it possible to analyze samples and perform studies that are not possible at room temperature, such as hydrated biological samples and fluid melt inclusions at cryogenic temperatures, high temperature phases of a material, and diffusion profiles requiring a wide range of temperatures. As a practical example, we will demonstrate the use of sample heating to quickly achieve low background levels of atmospherics (H, C, N, and O). Even though this is not the first variable temperature stage on a Cameca[2–4], the complexity of the Cameca 7F-GEO main chamber and motorized stage provided new constraints for the stage design. Our variable temperature stage design is innovative and preserves the integrity of the original Cameca design, requiring minimal instrument modification and costing less than $5000. This work focuses on the design and implementation challenges for the variable temperature stage and a newly designed sample holder with high thermal conductivity for rapid thermal stabilization and excellent spot to spot repeatability. [1] A. Giordani, J. Tuggle, C. Winkler, and J. Hunter, Surf. Interface Anal. 31 (2014). [2] M. T. Bernius, S. Chandra, and G. H. Morrison, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56, 1347 (1985). [3] S. M. Hues, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. 4, 1942 (1986). [4] M. Wiedenbeck, D. Rhede, R. Lieckefett, and H. Witzki, Appl. Surf. Sci. 231-232, 888 (2004). |
FN-TuP-7 Mass Resolution Comparison Considering Peak Shapes between TOF and Magnetic SIMS
Liangzhen Cha, Zhanping Li (Tsinghua University, China); Lixia Zhao (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China); Bing Xiong (Tsinghua University, China); Dunyi Liu (CAGS, China) A new TOF-SIMS is developing for geological application, where the useful results are traditionally obtained by the high performance magnetic SIMS, SHRIMP or CAMECA 1280. Mass resolution is very important. Thus, mass resolution comparison between TOF and Magnetic SIMS is a key problem for this project. However, due to the historical reasons, quite different definitions for mass resolution have been developed and used; including some established national or international standards, such as ASTM, ISO, IUPAC and AVS etc. What is the real situation? Can the real performance between instruments be compared by them? Is there important problem existed? What is the reason? Can the problem be overcome? Our investigated results during the past three years are summarized for further discussion. Nearly all of the existed definitions of mass resolution nowadays used are just restricting the peaks at a specific position in spite of the quite different real peak shapes, which is the most important problem. For example, while the definition is based on peak width at 50% or even x% maximum intensities only, it has to be noted that the shape of the spectral peaks could vary dramatically despite the same peak width. Thus it is quite possible for different spectrometers to share a same specific resolution defined by the peak width, if different peak shapes are taking into account. It is impossible to compare the real performance of the spectrometer by the peak width only. The peak shape has significant influence on the spectrometer resolution. Therefore, it is necessary to show the real peak shape to define mass resolution. The related discussions on SC6(Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry) and SC1(Terminology) of ISO /TC201(Surface Chemical Analysis) during the past 3 years will be mentioned briefly as well. The related experimental studies for the same samples by both of the TOF and Magnetic SIMS will be summarized and discussed. A suggested method considering peak shape to test SIMS mass resolution is preparing. Mass resolution is important not only for fundamental studies, but also for all of the quite different applications. More detailed studies and discussions are expected. |