ALD/ALE 2024 Session ALE2-WeM: Selectivity, Metrology and Diagnostics in ALE

Wednesday, August 7, 2024 10:45 AM in Room Hall 3F
Wednesday Morning

Session Abstract Book
(276KB, Jun 24, 2024)
Time Period WeM Sessions | Abstract Timeline | Topic ALE Sessions | Time Periods | Topics | ALD/ALE 2024 Schedule

Start Invited? Item
10:45 AM Invited ALE2-WeM-12 Interest and Potential of Atomic Layer Etching for Selective Deposition
Thierry Chevolleau (CEA/LETI-University Grenoble Alpes, France); Moustapha Jaffal (University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LTM, France); Remy Gassilloud (CEA/LETI-University Grenoble Alpes, France); Nicolas Possème (ST Microelectronics); Christophe Vallée (University of Albany); Marceline Bonvalot (University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LTM, France)

Selective deposition processes have attracted increased research interest in recent years due to their ability to precisely deposit thin films on specific substrate areas (for area-selective deposition) or on surfaces with specific orientations (for topographical selective deposition). These processes require a growth kinetic controlled by precursor/surface interactions with an atomic-scale precision, which usually relies on Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) techniques with or without plasma assistance (PEALD).

Several approaches have been proposed for selective deposition involving surface inhibition treatments with specific chemical agents (such as self-assembled molecules, small molecule inhibitors, plasma treatment) that increase the nucleation delay during subsequent ALD growth. However, the inhibition behavior eventually deteriorates after exposure to a few ALD cycles, necessitating the removal of nuclei formed on non-growth surfaces and the systematic regeneration of the inhibitor.

Another pathway for selective deposition is to combine ALD with Atomic Layer Etching (ALE). ALE involves self-limiting reactions that occur in a cyclic manner and consisting in a surface modification step followed by a removal step of the previously modified layer. Such a process results in the controlled and selective removal of a thin material layer.

In this presentation, we will focus on the interest and capabilities of ALE or quasi-ALE process for selective deposition. Based on several application examples such as liner deposition, we will highlight potential and related issues by coupling ALD and ALE for topographical selective deposition (growth and etch per cycle, selectivity with respect to the underneath layer, cross contamination...). We will also discuss about tools strategy to combine both ALD and ALE processes.

11:15 AM ALE2-WeM-14 Insight into SF6/H2 Plasma Mixtures to Expand the Capabilities of ALE
Guillaume Krieger, Silke Peeters, Bob Vonken, Nicholas Chittock, Adriaan Mackus, Erwin Kessels (Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands); Harm Knoops (Oxford Instruments Plasma Technology, The Netherlands)

The continuous downscaling of nanoelectronics combined with the ever-increasing diversity in materials and 3D geometries calls for highly precise and selective etching processes. Therefore the atomic layer etching (ALE) community must continue to develop a diverse toolbox of processes to enable both anisotropic and isotropic etching of the library of materials required in IC fabrication. Within this toolbox, recent works involving SF6:H2 plasma mixtures have demonstrated promising results for the etching of Si- and Ti-based materials1,2, with improved selectivity. However the etching mechanism is not yet well understood. Notably, the plasma species responsible for the onset of etching at a specific SF6:H2 ratio need to be identified.

Here, we present our first results from quadrupole mass spectroscopy (QMS) and optical emission spectroscopy (OES) measurements on SF6:H2 plasma mixtures. The plasma power, pressure and SF6:H2 ratio have been varied to observe their respective influence on the plasma composition. OES measurements show a high F radical emission intensity for SF6 rich plasma mixtures. QMS measurements reveal a maximum intensity of the m/z=20 signal, which could be related to the presence of HF, for a ratio of SF6/(SF6+H2) between 0.24 and 0.3. At this same ratio of plasma mixture, the signal of the m/z=34 mass (i.e H2S) drops drastically while the m/z=89 signal (i.e SF3+ acting as a fingerprint for SF6) starts to increase. Interestingly, under the same conditions, this specific range of gas ratios coincides with the etching onset of TaN at SF6/(SF6+H2)≈0.25. Furthermore, when an oxygen gas exposure step is added in the process, the oxidized TaOxNy top-layer can be etched at a smaller SF6/(SF6+H2) ratio≈0.2, equivalent to the etching onset of SiO2. These results show similarities to the selective ALE process reported by Hossain et al.1 between TiN and TiO2, occurring at a SF6/(SF6+H2)≈0.17, close to the ratio we report for TaN. By identifying the main trends in the plasma species present in the SF6/H2 plasma and comparing these observations to the ALE process window, we aim to improve the understanding of the underlying etching mechanisms. A greater knowledge of this process will help to extend this ALE chemistry to a wider range of materials.

References:

  1. Hossain, A. A. et al., JVST A41, 062601 (2023).
  2. Pankratiev, P. A. et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.1697, 012222 (2020).
View Supplemental Document (pdf)
11:30 AM ALE2-WeM-15 Retarding-Field Energy Analyzer as a Tool to Find the Process Window for Plasma-Assisted Atomic Layer Etching and Quasi-Atomic Layer Etching
Yoana Ilarionova, Reza Jafari Jam, Intu Sharma, Oscar Danielson, Sungyoun Ju, Asif Muhammad, Dmitry Suyatin, Amin Karimi, Jonas Sundqvist (AlixLabs AB)

As the fabrication of chips gets more demanding, atomic layer etching (ALE) provides a controlled way of etching without the surface damage typically associated with reactive-ion etching (RIE). ALE features 2 main steps – surface modification and etch. If inert-ion plasma is chosen to etch, ion energy makes the difference between ALE and physical sputtering. This is why the ion energy distribution function (IEDF) is a very important property when designing plasma-assisted ALE processes.

In this study, we used retarding-field energy analyzer (RFEA) System from Impedans Ltd for IEDF measurements. This enabled us to effectively find and tune the ALE process windows for Si and III-V materials. The experiments were done with Ar plasma in a few standard etch chambers for inductively-coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) from different vendors. We examined how different process parameters and their interplay influence the IEDF. This is very important for understanding the right combination of process parameters for ALE and the limitations of quasi-ALE processes that can be achieved with this equipment. This also guides in finding the right hardware modifications for improving the ALE processes and their stability in conventional equipment readily available in research labs and semiconductor fabs. This is also valuable for designing dedicated hardware for ALE processes, especially for industry.

Session Abstract Book
(276KB, Jun 24, 2024)
Time Period WeM Sessions | Abstract Timeline | Topic ALE Sessions | Time Periods | Topics | ALD/ALE 2024 Schedule